Joe, a production worker in a doll manufacturing plant, recently changed positions on the manufacturing line from painting the eyes, to attaching arms to each doll. In the past, his work was always impeccable with a very low rate of mistakes, but since the switch, the quality team has found numerous dolls with arms that were haphazardly attached. A majority of the flawed-arm dolls are from Joe's assembly line.
It could probably be said that because of his history with excellent quality, in this situation Joe would be considered to have:

A high consistency and high distinctiveness.
B low consistency and high distinctiveness.
C low consensus and low consistency.
D low distinctiveness and high consistency.
E high consensus and low distinctiveness.

Since Joe's work can be divided into two groups, with the first one being high-quality consistent doll eye work, and the second one low-quality consistent doll arm work, his work is high in consistency (no matter if the quality is exceptional or bad and high in distinctiveness (he does not perform two tasks in the same manner - quite the contrary, his productivity is vastly different).