contestada

The arguments expressed in the passage are significant because they help explain why social divisions within colonial societies often hindered the efforts of anticolonial movements to overthrow imperial rule

Respuesta :

AntonioRamon

Answer:

It's TRUE

Explanation:

The social classes and the stratification was a way to avoid riots and revolutions against the Imperial Rule. To achieve this propose, the dominant classes were always the king employees or merchants and nobles who didn't want to lose their privileges. The minor classes didn't have the opportunity to overthrow the imperial rule because of their position on the social pyramid, especially the lack of influence they had.

The attempts of anticolonial forces to topple imperial power were frequently hampered by socioeconomic differences within colonial communities.

So the statement is true.

Colonialism is defined as a foreign power's long-term exercise of political, social, economic, and cultural dominance over a people. Indigenous peoples, such as tribal communities, have frequently become a minority in areas where they were once the majority (dominant) group due to colonialism.

About social divisions within colonial societies :

  • The establishment of social classes and stratification was a means of preventing riots and revolutions against Imperial rule.

  • The dominating classes in order to achieve this proposal were always the king's employees, merchants, and aristocrats who did not want to relinquish their advantages.

  • Because of their low social status and lack of influence, the lesser classes were unable to overturn the imperial government.

For more information About social divisions within colonial societies refer to the link:

https://brainly.com/question/23157880