Respuesta :
Answer:
It requires that law enforcement officers read a person his or her rights when they are arrested.
Explanation:
The Miranda v. Arizona (1966) case brought to limelight the laxity of policemen in reminding arrested suspects of their rights of self incriminating as failure to inform them would render any confession made invalid in court. Miranda was not informed of his Constitutional rights before interrogation by the police.
The case Miranda v. Arizona change the interpretation of the Fifth Amendment because it requires that law enforcement officers read a person his or her rights when they are arrested.
Answer:
Dogyciftdrtxrxrtcryctc
Explanation:
So u can give the Luther dude Brainliest